Art is life.
This is the ideal that has ruled this day. I've finished 1984, a book I ought to have read ages ago, but as such a task was never asked of me, i never gave it a second thought until suddenly one day, when the realization came to me that the task had never been asked of me.
I thought it was quite moving. All having to do with politics was scary, in that it resembles too much the world i see when i step out the front door each morning, read about on the internet, or see on tv (on the off-chance that i happen to watch tv). The romance in the middle is quite well done, vague enough to allow me to put my own feelings, reveries, and hopes into the characters and thus identify with them more readily, and also explicit enough to carry on the meaning the author intends the event to have.
Some have mentioned that the ending was predictable. In a way, i suppose it is, but certainly not in a way that fits the jigs of my mind. Perhaps to one who expects capitulation, for whatever reason, the ending seems fitting, but for one of my adventurous triumphant nature, the ending seemed less revolutionary than i had expected. On the other hand, perhaps, then, it is I who am deceived. Perhaps I have seen revolutions happen in works of fiction so frequently and consistently that i am now surprised at an ending wherein not only does the protagonist not conquer evil, or perceived evil, but never even has a chance at so doing. On the one hand, this is a good thing for 1984, because it allows the author to develop further his ideas about why the Party is the way it is, why the society portrayed in the book is as it is, and....there is no more. So rather than learning about the proper way to oppose it, we learn more about that which is to be opposed. Knowing thine enemy, it is said, is prudent. Indeed, as it applies to the society in which i live, it is important to understand the inner workings of the bodies of power to better realize how they are corrupt and what can be done about that.
This ending is in stark contrast to Fahrenheit 451, wherein the protagonist is able to escape the oppressive society, and we never really learn as much about it as we learn about the Party in 1984.
I certainly appreciate Orwell's grasp and ability to communicate his knowledge of both politics and of psychology. Perhaps to a more learned reader, these seem less profound, but as a novice at both schools of thought, i found the key points educational.
Furthermore, again was a good author able to pump up my heart with a straw and then, as ungracefully as an elephant can-canning, cleave it in twain with a blunt spoon. Carmody did that to a greater degree, but the feeling was nevertheless present with 1984.
Perhaps this is more my own fault; perhaps at this point i am just more prone to emotions in general, and it takes far less to excise the feelings out of me. Excise? Either way, i feel a benefit in experiencing that which i have been forcibly repressing for fear of being swallowed up, if only to project it onto fictional characters.
Now, for no other reason than it was the nearest, I begin the enjoyble toil of To The Lighthouse. Alysia told me once that she hasn't the time currently to read it because she gets too immersed in the beauty of each sentence, and I certainly see that. I am trying not to get lost, but Woolf's style is like a winged fairie that caresses your mind, body, and heart with a gentle feeling of serenity that is far too easy to become entrapped in to be able to read without the occasional sigh of appreciation that such a pleasurable thing to rad has been written seemingly for the reader's benefit.
We'll see how far i get before i force myself to bed tonight.